United States v. Ignacio Estrada Olvera
This text of 488 F.2d 607 (United States v. Ignacio Estrada Olvera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was charged with possession of amphetamine, in violation of the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. A. § 13, which made applicable the provisions of Art. 726d, Vernon’s Ann.Penal Code of Texas. He entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to two years confinement.
There is a federal statute, 21 U.S.C.A. § 844(a), which is applicable to the offense. Violation of that statute is only a misdemeanor, and the maximum eon- *608 finement under it is one year. The government concedes that the federal statute is controlling rather than the Assim-ilative Crimes Act and the Texas statute, violation of which is a felony.
The sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded for the entry of a new judgment imposing sentence under the federal statute. Hockenberry v. United States, 422 F.2d 171 (CA9, 1970); Dunaway v. United States, 170 F.2d 11 (CA10, 1948). Cf. Kniess v. United States, 413 F.2d 752 (CA9, 1969); Moorman v. United States, 389 F.2d 27 (CA5, 1968).
There is no merit to appellant’s other claims.
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 F.2d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ignacio-estrada-olvera-ca5-1974.