United States v. Ignacio Estrada Olvera

488 F.2d 607
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 5, 1974·No. 73-2712·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was charged with possession of amphetamine, in violation of the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. A. § 13, which made applicable the provisions of Art. 726d, Vernon’s Ann.Penal Code of Texas. He entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to two years confinement.

There is a federal statute, 21 U.S.C.A. § 844(a), which is applicable to the offense. Violation of that statute is only a misdemeanor, and the maximum eon- *608 finement under it is one year. The government concedes that the federal statute is controlling rather than the Assim-ilative Crimes Act and the Texas statute, violation of which is a felony.

The sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded for the entry of a new judgment imposing sentence under the federal statute. Hockenberry v. United States, 422 F.2d 171 (CA9, 1970); Dunaway v. United States, 170 F.2d 11 (CA10, 1948). Cf. Kniess v. United States, 413 F.2d 752 (CA9, 1969); Moorman v. United States, 389 F.2d 27 (CA5, 1968).

There is no merit to appellant’s other claims.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ignacio Estrada Olvera, 488 F.2d 607 (5th Cir. 1974).

488 F.2d 607 (United States v. Ignacio Estrada Olvera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James M. Lewis Debra Faye Lewis
92 F.3d 1371 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Lewis
Fifth Circuit, 1996
United States v. Harry Lynn Hall
979 F.2d 320 (Third Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Raymond Wayne Blue A/K/A Budagau
722 F.2d 383 (Eighth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Adams
502 F. Supp. 21 (S.D. Florida, 1980)
United States v. Dawkins
7 M.J. 720 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1979)
United States v. Narciso
446 F. Supp. 252 (E.D. Michigan, 1977)
United States v. Darelle Dean Butler
541 F.2d 730 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)