United States v. Ignacio
71 M.J. 150, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 8, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0202/NA
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 150 (United States v. Ignacio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Ignacio, 71 M.J. 150, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 182 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 201100062. Review granted on the following issue:
IN AN ARTICLE 120(h), UCMJ, CASE, THE MILITARY JUDGE FAILED TO INSTRUCT THE MEMBERS TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE EVIDENCE, INCLUDING THE EVIDENCE OF CONSENT, WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT PROVED GUILT BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES [151]*151v. PRATHER, AND UNITED STATES v. CHEESEMAN, DOES THE APPLICATION OF THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE PROVIDED BY ARTICLE 120 WITHOUT THE AFOREMENTIONED INSTRUCTION VIOLATE APPELLANT’S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS?
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 150, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ignacio-armfor-2012.