United States v. Ibrahima Sarr

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ibrahima Sarr. Read the opinion of the Court — 441 F. App'x 178
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2013·No. 13-6246·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6246

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

IBRAHIMA SARR, a/k/a Ibu, a/k/a Abou, a/k/a Abou Sall, a/k/a Abou Diop, a/k/a Mousa Fall,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ibrahima Sarr, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ibrahima Sarr appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Sarr, No. 2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1

(E.D. Va. filed Jan. 30, 2013; entered Jan. 31, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ibrahima Sarr, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Ibrahima Sarr (United States v. Ibrahima Sarr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.