United States v. Ibarra-Garcia
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Martin Ibarra-Garcia appeals from the judgment imposed following a jury-trial [778]*778conviction for being an alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ibarra-Garcia’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ibarra-Garcia filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81,109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
203 F. App'x 777 (United States v. Ibarra-Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.