United States v. Ibarra

37 F. App'x 927
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2002·No. No. 01-50723; D.C. No. CR-01-01788-JSR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM**

George Uriel Ibarra appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for one count of importation of marijuana (21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960) and one count of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)). Ibarra’s contention that Sections 952, 960, and 841 are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc) (§ 841), United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 [928] (9th Cir.2002) (§ 952), and United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-1111 (9th Cir.2002) (§ 960).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ibarra, 37 F. App'x 927 (9th Cir. 2002).

37 F. App'x 927 (United States v. Ibarra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Uriel Ibarra v. United States
537 U.S. 966 (Supreme Court, 2002)