United States v. Iaquinta

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Iaquinta

581 F. App'x 264

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 15, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6236

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 581 F. App'x 264 (United States v. Iaquinta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Iaquinta, 581 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Albert F. Iaquinta appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4247(h) (West 2012 & Supp.2014) to determine whether he should be discharged. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Albert F. Iaquinta appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4247(h) (West 2012 & Supp.2014) to determine whether he should be discharged. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 F. App'x 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-iaquinta-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack