United States v. Hussain

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Hussain

313 F. App'x 227

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 18, 2009·No. No. 07-14865·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ellis Rexwood Curry, IV, appointed counsel for Aleem Hussain in this direct criminal and sentencing appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hussain’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ellis Rexwood Curry, IV, appointed counsel for Aleem Hussain in this direct criminal and sentencing appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hussain’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Hussain, 313 F. App'x 227 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

313 F. App'x 227 (United States v. Hussain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related