United States v. Hurst
Opinion
Brent Armstrong, appointed counsel for Tracy Lynn Hurst in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hurst’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
472 F. App'x 892 (United States v. Hurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.