United States v. Hunter

26 F. Cas. 439, 5 Mason C.C. 229
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island·Decided November 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

STORY, Circuit Justice.

The court are of opinion, that the master’was right, and therefore overrule the exception. The expenses of recovering the money are first to be deducted from the gross proceeds received by the defendant, as a charge thereon. The neat amount, after all deductions, is that alone, which he is compellable to distribute; and to that the right of priority of the United States attaches. That is the fund, from which they are to receive payment; and, un til it is exhausted, their right of priority to the extent of satisfaction is fixed. It is like the common case of administration. There, the expenses are first deducted, and the residue is what is distributable according to the priorities established by law. Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hunter, 26 F. Cas. 439, 5 Mason C.C. 229 (circtdri 1828).

26 F. Cas. 439 (United States v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Funk
849 N.E.2d 366 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2006)
United States v. Printy
50 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 709 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2006)
Gobrecht's Estate
47 Pa. D. & C. 134 (Lehigh County Orphans' Court, 1943)
In re the Final Accounting of Stiles
126 Misc. 715 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1926)
United States v. Hahn
37 Mo. App. 580 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)