United States v. Hunt

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hunt

260 F. App'x 559

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hunt. Read the opinion of the Court — 403 F. App'x 837 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2007·No. No. 07-7103·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Alan Hunt appeals the district court’s order denying a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate, for lack of jurisdiction, Hunt’s 2002 criminal conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hunt, No. 3:01-cr-00982-MJP (D.S.C. July 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Richard Alan Hunt appeals the district court’s order denying a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate, for lack of jurisdiction, Hunt’s 2002 criminal conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hunt, No. 3:01-cr-00982-MJP (D.S.C. July 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

United States v. Hunt, 260 F. App'x 559 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

260 F. App'x 559 (United States v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.