United States v. Humphries

70 M.J. 350

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Humphries. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 M.J. 209 →

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided September 15, 2011·No. No. 10-5004/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA 37632. The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force has requested that action be taken with respect to the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING APPELLEE’S SENTENCE INAPPROPRIATELY SEVERE UNDER THE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE AND ERRED IN AN ATTEMPT AT EXERCISING APPELLATE CLEMENCY BY REMANDING THE CASE TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY WITH INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE CONVENING AUTHORITY MAY APPROVE AN ADJUDGED SENTENCE NO GREATER THAN A SUSPENDED BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE AND A REDUCTION TO THE GRADE OF E-l.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 37632. The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force has requested that action be taken with respect to the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING APPELLEE’S SENTENCE INAPPROPRIATELY SEVERE UNDER THE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE AND ERRED IN AN ATTEMPT AT EXERCISING APPELLATE CLEMENCY BY REMANDING THE CASE TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY WITH INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE CONVENING AUTHORITY MAY APPROVE AN ADJUDGED SENTENCE NO GREATER THAN A SUSPENDED BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE AND A REDUCTION TO THE GRADE OF E-l.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

United States v. Humphries, 70 M.J. 350 (Ark. 2011).

Pincite

70 M.J. 350 (United States v. Humphries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.