Home/Supreme Court/United States v. Hulley

United States v. Hulley

358 U.S. 66, 79 S. Ct. 117, 3 L. Ed. 2d 106, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1910, 2 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6052
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 10, 1958
Docket300
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 358 U.S. 66 (United States v. Hulley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hulley, 358 U.S. 66, 79 S. Ct. 117, 3 L. Ed. 2d 106, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1910, 2 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6052 (1958).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted and judgment reversed and remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida. See United States v. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 340 U. S. 47; United States v. Gilbert Associates, 345 U. S. 361; United States v. New Britain, 347 U. S. 81; United States v. Acri, 348 U. S. 211; United States v. Liverpool & London Ins. Co., 348 U. S. 215; United States v. Scovil, 348 U. S. 218; United States v. Colotta, 350 U. S. 808; United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., 350 U. S. 1010; United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U. S. 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kimbell Foods, Inc. v. Republic Nat. Bank of Dallas
401 F. Supp. 316 (N.D. Texas, 1975)
University Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marlin Development Co.
24 Fla. Supp. 145 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1964)
United States v. Vermont
377 U.S. 351 (Supreme Court, 1964)
General Telephone Co. of Illinois v. American Casualty Co. of Reading
226 F. Supp. 929 (S.D. Illinois, 1964)
United States v. McGehee
375 S.W.2d 365 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1964)
W. T. Jones and Company, Incorporated, and Noland Company, Inc., and Marvin Moseley v. Foodco Realty, Inc., and United States of America
318 F.2d 881 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
United States v. The State of Vermont, Cutting & Trimming, Inc., Chittenden Trust Company Ofburlington, Rainbow Children's Dress Company of New York
317 F.2d 446 (Second Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Costas
142 So. 2d 699 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
United States v. Weissman
135 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Allan v. Diamond T Motor Car Company
291 F.2d 115 (Tenth Circuit, 1961)
Allan v. Diamond T Motor Car Co.
291 F.2d 115 (Tenth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. L. C. Chapman
281 F.2d 862 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
Aquilino v. United States
363 U.S. 509 (Supreme Court, 1960)
United States v. Brosnan
363 U.S. 237 (Supreme Court, 1960)
United States v. V. F. Bond, Audrey A. Bond
279 F.2d 837 (Fourth Circuit, 1960)
River Rouge Savings Bank v. S & M Building Co.
101 N.W.2d 260 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 U.S. 66, 79 S. Ct. 117, 3 L. Ed. 2d 106, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1910, 2 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hulley-scotus-1958.