United States v. Hulley
102 So. 2d 599
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hulley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1748 →
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
E.B. HULLEY and Bess M. Hulley, his wife; H.P. Effross and Dorothy Effross, his wife; James O. Lewis; C. Glow; Louis Lackey and Joseph Katz, a co-partnership d/b/a Pasadena Material Co.; Harold C. Anderson Lumber Co., Inc., a Florida corporation; R. Malcolm Whitworth, Jr.; Burford Distributing Co., a corporation; Albert Sherouse; and John H. Squires, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., A.F. Prescott and Robert Coe, Washington, D.C., and James L. Guilmartin, Miami, and Richard Kelly, Tampa, for appellant.
*600 Robert W. Fisher, St. Petersburg, for Harold C. Anderson Lumber Company, Inc., appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of United States v. Griffin-Moore Lumber Co., Inc., Fla., 62 So.2d 589.
TERRELL, C.J., and THOMAS, HOBSON, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hulley, 102 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1958).
102 So. 2d 599 (United States v. Hulley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Griffin-Moore Lumber Co.
62 So. 2d 589 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
United States v. Hulley
102 So. 2d 599 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)