United States v. Hughs
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8192
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO HUGHS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-00703-GRA-12)
Submitted: May 18, 2010 Decided: June 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Hughs, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Antonio Hughs appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Hughs, No. 6:03-cr-00703-GRA-12 (D.S.C. Nov. 20,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hughs (United States v. Hughs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.