United States v. Hughs

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2010·No. 09-8192·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8192

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO HUGHS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-00703-GRA-12)

Submitted: May 18, 2010 Decided: June 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Hughs, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antonio Hughs appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Hughs, No. 6:03-cr-00703-GRA-12 (D.S.C. Nov. 20,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hughs, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Hughs (United States v. Hughs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.