United States v. Hughes

19 C.M.A. 510, 19 USCMA 510, 42 C.M.R. 112, 1970 CMA LEXIS 823, 1970 WL 7014
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 26, 1970·No. No. 22,956·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

The circumstances of this case are like those in United States v Pieragowski, 19 USCMA 508, 42 CMR 110, decided this date. For the reasons stated in our opinion in Pier a,goto ski, the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review as to specification 2 of the charge is reversed. The findings of guilty of specification 2 are set aside and the specification is ordered dismissed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for submission to the Court of Military Review for reassessment of the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hughes, 19 C.M.A. 510, 19 USCMA 510, 42 C.M.R. 112, 1970 CMA LEXIS 823, 1970 WL 7014 (cma 1970).

19 C.M.A. 510 (United States v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Fornash
2 M.J. 1045 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Burston
2 M.J. 1015 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Black
1 M.J. 340 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
Schroth v. Warner
353 F. Supp. 1032 (D. Hawaii, 1973)
United States v. Morley
20 C.M.A. 179 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)