United States v. Hughes

10 F. App'x 167
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hughes. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 F. App'x 467
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2001·No. No. 00-2466·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its forfeiture action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hughes, No. CA-00-107-3 (E .D.Va. Oct. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hughes, 10 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2001).

10 F. App'x 167 (United States v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.