United States v. Hughes

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 3, 1996
• Docket: 96-6098
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN DAREN HUGHES, a/k/a Ellis Rasheed Williams, a/k/a L,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-209-G)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Daren Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence filed under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. CR-91-209-G (M.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED