United States v. Hugh William Murtaugh

396 F.2d 222
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedAugust 21, 1968
Docket16915
StatusPublished

This text of 396 F.2d 222 (United States v. Hugh William Murtaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hugh William Murtaugh, 396 F.2d 222 (3d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Hugh William Murtaugh from a judgment of conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2312, for transporting a stolen motor vehicle across state lines. Defendant-appellant contends that the district court committed reversible error by permitting the Assistant United States Attorney to cross-examine one witness beyond the scope of the direct examination, and by permitting other witnesses to give testimony which was irrelevant, immaterial, and highly prejudicial.

We have carefully considered all of appellant’s contentions and we have independently examined the entire record. We can find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 F.2d 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hugh-william-murtaugh-ca3-1968.