United States v. Hugh William Murtaugh
This text of 396 F.2d 222 (United States v. Hugh William Murtaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal by Hugh William Murtaugh from a judgment of conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2312, for transporting a stolen motor vehicle across state lines. Defendant-appellant contends that the district court committed reversible error by permitting the Assistant United States Attorney to cross-examine one witness beyond the scope of the direct examination, and by permitting other witnesses to give testimony which was irrelevant, immaterial, and highly prejudicial.
We have carefully considered all of appellant’s contentions and we have independently examined the entire record. We can find no reversible error.
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment of conviction will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
396 F.2d 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hugh-william-murtaugh-ca3-1968.