United States v. Huff

19 C.M.A. 56, 19 USCMA 56, 41 C.M.R. 56, 1969 CMA LEXIS 650, 1969 WL 6279
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided November 7, 1969·No. No. 22,324·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

The accused was convicted by a special court-martial of various acts of misconduct directed against other members of the armed forces. He contends that since the offenses were committed in the civilian community and are cognizable in a civilian court they are not triable by court-martial under O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969).

Assaults and other injuries by one member of the armed forces against another are acts having military significance and are, therefore, not within the constitutional limitation on court-martial jurisdiction expounded in the O’Callahan case. United States v Plamondon, 19 USCMA 22, 41 CMR 22. The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Huff, 19 C.M.A. 56, 19 USCMA 56, 41 C.M.R. 56, 1969 CMA LEXIS 650, 1969 WL 6279 (cma 1969).

19 C.M.A. 56 (United States v. Huff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bender
2 M.J. 738 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1977)
United States v. Hedlund
2 M.J. 11 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
United States v. Moore
1 M.J. 448 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
Hooper v. Laird
19 C.M.A. 329 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)