United States v. Hudson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hudson. Read the opinion of the Court — 659 F.3d 1056
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 4, 2011·No. 10-14428·Published

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 4, 2011 No. 10-14428 JOHN LEY CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 2:07-cr-14081-KMM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES LEVERN HUDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------------- On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida --------------------------

(Opinion May 11, 2011, 11th Cir. 2011)

(October 4, 2011)

BEFORE: DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges*.

B Y T H E C O U R T:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the petitioner for

rehearing and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of

granting a rehearing en banc,

__________________ *Senior United States Circuit Judge Peter F. Fay has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. The previous

panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

__________________ *Senior United States Circuit Judge Peter F. Fay has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hudson, (11th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Hudson (United States v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related