United States v. Hudgins

191 F. App'x 227

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Maurice Hudgins appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion to vacate and reimpose judgment,” which the court construed as a motion to reopen the time for filing an appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hudgins, No. 7:94-cr-00133-sgw (W.D.Va. Jan. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.