United States v. Hudgens
This text of United States v. Hudgens (United States v. Hudgens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-10279 Document: 00515920400 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2021
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED June 30, 2021 No. 20-10279 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Franklin Lee Hudgens,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18-CR-573-12
Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Franklin Lee Hudgens has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hudgens has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-10279 Document: 00515920400 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2021
No. 20-10279
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hudgens’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hudgens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hudgens-ca5-2021.