United States v. Howell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 1997·No. 97-6364·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6364

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN HOWELL, a/k/a William Anthony Johnson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-

tion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Howell, Nos. CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Howell, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Howell (United States v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related