United States v. Howard Lane

32 F. App'x 792
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2002
Docket01-3795
StatusUnpublished

This text of 32 F. App'x 792 (United States v. Howard Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Howard Lane, 32 F. App'x 792 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following a hearing, the district court 1 ordered Howard Lane committed under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 to the custody of the Attorney General, for hospital care and treatment in a suitable facility until treatment is no longer needed or his sentence expires, whichever occurs first. Mr. Lane appeals. Having carefully reviewed the record, we are satisfied that the district court’s findings as to Mr. Lane’s condition are not clearly erroneous. See 18 U.S.C. *793 § 4245(d) (burden of proof); United States v. S.A., 129 F.3d 995, 1000 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1011, 118 S.Ct. 1200, 140 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998). Accordingly, we affirm.

Additionally, we grant counsel’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. S.A.
129 F.3d 995 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Alphonse v. United States
523 U.S. 1011 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 F. App'x 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-howard-lane-ca8-2002.