United States v. Howard Ernest James
426 F.2d 299, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9219
Opinion
Howard Ernest James appeals his conviction for interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Upon our consideration of the briefs and the record, we find ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Oral argument is unnecessary, and we grant the United States’ motion for summary affirmance.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Howard Ernest James, 426 F.2d 299, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9219 (4th Cir. 1970).
426 F.2d 299 (United States v. Howard Ernest James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Transportation of stolen vehicles
18 U.S.C. § 2312