United States v. Howard Ernest James

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Howard Ernest James

426 F.2d 299, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9219

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1970

Docket14098

StatusPublished

This text of 426 F.2d 299 (United States v. Howard Ernest James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Howard Ernest James, 426 F.2d 299, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9219 (4th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Howard Ernest James appeals his conviction for interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Upon our consideration of the briefs and the record, we find ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Oral argument is unnecessary, and we grant the United States’ motion for summary affirmance.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Howard Ernest James appeals his conviction for interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Upon our consideration of the briefs and the record, we find ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Oral argument is unnecessary, and we grant the United States’ motion for summary affirmance.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

426 F.2d 299, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-howard-ernest-james-ca4-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack