United States v. Howard Cotterman

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Howard Cotterman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Howard Cotterman. Read the opinion of the Court — 709 F.3d 952 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2012·No. 09-10139·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-10139 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  4:07-cr-01207- HOWARD WESLEY COTTERMAN, RCC-CRP-1 Defendant-Appellee.  ORDER

Filed March 19, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-10139 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  4:07-cr-01207- HOWARD WESLEY COTTERMAN, RCC-CRP-1 Defendant-Appellee.  ORDER

Filed March 19, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

United States v. Howard Cotterman, (9th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

United States v. Howard Cotterman (United States v. Howard Cotterman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.