United States v. Howard

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 480 F.3d 1005
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2006·No. 03-50524·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50524 v.  D.C. No. JESSE LEE HOWARD, CR-03-00390-GAF Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50525 v.  D.C. No. JOSE LUIS FARIAS-BLANCO, 03-0861M-ABC Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50526 v.  D.C. No. JOSE ANGEL CEDILLOS, 03-0890M-ABC Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50527 v.  D.C. No. ROBERT HERMAN BOULIES, 03-0945M-ABC Defendant-Appellant. 

11345 11346 UNITED STATES v. HOWARD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50532 v.  D.C. No. CR-03-00435- DANIEL RIVERA-GONZALEZ, RSWL Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50533 v.  D.C. No. JORGE PINEDA-FERNANDEZ, a/k/a CR-03-00439-GHK Jorge Peneda, Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50534 v.  D.C. No. CR-03-00486- RANDOLPH ARTHUR CISNEROS, RSWL Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50535 v.  D.C. No. CORNELIO GARCIA-CHAVEZ, CR-03-00493-NMM Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES v. HOWARD 11347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 03-50536 JOSE CABANILLAS-NUNEZ, a/k/a Jose  D.C. No. Arsenio Cabanillas, Jose Arencio CR-03-00509-DMT Nunez, Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50537 v.  D.C. No. RAYMOND FLORES, CR-03-00516-R-02 Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50538 v.  D.C. No. CR-03-00533-FMC- CHRISTIAN RAUDALES, 02 Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50539 v.  D.C. No. MIGUEL LENCIA, 03-0858M-ABC Defendant-Appellant.  11348 UNITED STATES v. HOWARD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50540 v.  D.C. No. RAYMOND CAZARES, 03-089M-ABC Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50541 v.  D.C. No. VERNON CROCKER, 03-0899M-ABC Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50542 v.  D.C. No. LORENA GALLARDO, 03-0944M-ABC Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50543 v.  D.C. No. JEFFREY DARRYL WAFER, 03-0860M-ABC Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES v. HOWARD 11349

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-50544 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 03-0896M-ABC PEDRO F. SANDOVAL-SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-50545 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 03-0942M-ABC CARLOS ALVAREZ, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.  Filed September 15, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Ronald M. Gould and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The panel has voted to grant the Petition for Rehearing.

The opinion filed November 15, 2005 is hereby withdrawn and the Clerk of Court is directed to file the attached opinion in substitution. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Howard, (9th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Howard (United States v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.