United States v. Howard
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-30393 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
GREGORY CHARLES HOWARD,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:03-CR-174-1 --------------------
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Gregory Charles Howard has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of counsel’s brief, the record, and Howard’s responses
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Howard’s motion for appointment
of substitute counsel is DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Howard (United States v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.