United States v. Houston

310 F. Supp. 847, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13797
District Court, E.D. Tennessee·Decided August 25, 1969·No. Crim. No. 6957·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

The defendant Mr. Houston, who has no other matter pending in this Court, has moved the Court to provide him with a complete transcript of all proceedings herein and certain other documents. Neither 28 U.S.C.A. see. 753 (f) nor sec. 1915 entitles a federal prisoner to obtain such a transcript at government expense for the purpose of preparing a motion to vacate or set aside his sentence, as Mr. Houston states he wishes to do. Dorsey v. United States, C.A. 6th (1964), 333 F.2d 1015, certiorari denied (1965), 379 U.S. 994, 85 S. Ct. 711, 13 L.Ed.2d 613, citing Ketcherside v. United States, C.A. 6th (1963), 317 F.2d 807, 808.

[848]*848As has been observed, an indigent is not entitled to a transcript at government expense, merely to comb the record in the hope of discovering some flaw. United States v. Glass, C.A. 4th (1963), 317 F.2d 200, 202 [2]. Accordingly, Mr. Houston’s aforesaid motion hereby is Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Houston, 310 F. Supp. 847, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13797 (E.D. Tenn. 1969).

310 F. Supp. 847 (United States v. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jerome Dwight Glass
317 F.2d 200 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
Kermit Ketcherside v. United States
317 F.2d 807 (Sixth Circuit, 1963)
Charles Edward Dorsey v. United States
333 F.2d 1015 (Sixth Circuit, 1964)