United States v. Houston
This text of 691 F. App'x 751 (United States v. Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the full court. No judge requested a poll under Fed. R. App. P. 35. The court denies the petition for rehearing en banc.
Statement of Senior Circuit Judge Davis Respecting Denial of En Banc Rehearing
The Court’s denial of the petition for rehearing en banc should not give rise to a [752]*752conclusion that the issues presented are unimportant or undeserving of timely consideration by the Supreme Court. Indeed, the recent filing of a petition for certiorari in a similar case arising in the Third Circuit, see United States v. Byrd, 679 Fed. Appx. 146, 2017 WL 541405 (3d Cir. 2017), pet. for cert. filed, No. 16-1371 (May 11, 2017), reflects that the issues are recqrring and worthy of plenary consideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 F. App'x 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-houston-ca4-2017.