United States v. Houston

691 F. App'x 751
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2017·No. No. 16-4340·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the full court. No judge requested a poll under Fed. R. App. P. 35. The court denies the petition for rehearing en banc.

Statement of Senior Circuit Judge Davis Respecting Denial of En Banc Rehearing

The Court’s denial of the petition for rehearing en banc should not give rise to a [752]*752conclusion that the issues presented are unimportant or undeserving of timely consideration by the Supreme Court. Indeed, the recent filing of a petition for certiorari in a similar case arising in the Third Circuit, see United States v. Byrd, 679 Fed. Appx. 146, 2017 WL 541405 (3d Cir. 2017), pet. for cert. filed, No. 16-1371 (May 11, 2017), reflects that the issues are recqrring and worthy of plenary consideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Houston, 691 F. App'x 751 (4th Cir. 2017).

691 F. App'x 751 (United States v. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Terrence Byrd
679 F. App'x 146 (Third Circuit, 2017)