United States v. Houser

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Houser

60 F. App'x 972

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2003·No. Nos. 03-6164, 03-6165·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Thomas Houser appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for transcripts at the Government’s expense and other documents related to his criminal convictions, which he did not appeal following his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Houser, Nos. CR-01-125; CR-02-36 (E.D.Va. Jan. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[973] fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Thomas Houser appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for transcripts at the Government’s expense and other documents related to his criminal convictions, which he did not appeal following his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Houser, Nos. CR-01-125; CR-02-36 (E.D.Va. Jan. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[973] fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Houser, 60 F. App'x 972 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

60 F. App'x 972 (United States v. Houser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.