United States v. Horton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Horton

33 F. App'x 93

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Horton. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 F. App'x 254 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2002·No. 01-4931·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John D. Horton appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Horton, No. CR-01-617-DEN (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 14, 2001; entered Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John D. Horton appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Horton, No. CR-01-617-DEN (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 14, 2001; entered Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Horton, 33 F. App'x 93 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 93 (United States v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.