United States v. Horton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Horton

33 F. App'x 93

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 25, 2002

Docket01-4931

StatusUnpublished

This text of 33 F. App'x 93 (United States v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Horton, 33 F. App'x 93 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John D. Horton appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Horton, No. CR-01-617-DEN (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 14, 2001; entered Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John D. Horton appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Horton, No. CR-01-617-DEN (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 14, 2001; entered Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F. App'x 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-horton-ca4-2002.