United States v. Horses
Opinion
I am of opinion that in this case the seizure having been on land the burden of proof is on the United-States, and that the proof is insufficient on their part upon each of the two points of alleged hostile ownership and of the alleged destination to a hostile State or district, and consequently that the prosecution cannot be maintained upon the statute on which it is founded. The claimants praying by their counsel in open court a simple 'decree of restitution without any order on the subject of costs or charges. It is ordered that the property seized be liberated from custody and restored to the claimant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 E.D. Pa. 531 (United States v. Horses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.