United States v. Horner

1 M.J. 227, 1975 CMA LEXIS 587
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided November 28, 1975·No. No. 30,082·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

At petitioner’s trial by special court-martial, the military judge failed to instruct the court on the sentence voting procedures provided by paragraph 76b (2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Rev). In light of the punitive discharge imposed in this case, a rehearing on the sentence is required. United States v. Johnson, 18 U.S.C.M.A. 436, 40 C.M.R. 148 (1969).

Accordingly, the decision of the U.S. Army Court of Military Review as to the sentence is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Horner, 1 M.J. 227, 1975 CMA LEXIS 587 (cma 1975).

1 M.J. 227 (United States v. Horner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gomez
15 M.J. 954 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1983)