United States v. Hornback
73 M.J. 57, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1126
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedSeptember 24, 2013
DocketNo. 13-0442/MC
StatusPublished
This text of 73 M.J. 57 (United States v. Hornback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Hornback, 73 M.J. 57, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1126 (Ark. 2013).
Opinion
CCA 201200241. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING NO MATERIAL PREJUDICE TO APPELLANT’S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AFTER IT ASSUMED, WITHOUT DECIDING, THAT TRIAL COUNSEL’S ACTIONS AMOUNTED TO MISCONDUCT, AND WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE’S CURATIVE INSTRUCTIONS SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED THE CUMULATIVE NATURE OF SUCH CONDUCT AS WELL AS ANY CORRESPONDING PREJUDICE IN LIGHT OF [58]*58THE FACTORS IDENTIFIED IN UNITED STATES v. FLETCHER, 62 M.J. 175 (C.A.A.F. 2005).
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Fletcher
62 M.J. 175 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 M.J. 57, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hornback-armfor-2013.