United States v. Hope

408 F. App'x 695
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2011·No. No. 10-4620·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Curtis Hope pled guilty to felony eluding, in violation of Va.Code Ann. § 46.2-817(B) (2010), as assimilated by the Assimilative Crimes Act (“ACA”), 18 U.S.C. § 13 (2006). He appeals, claiming that the assimilated state statute was a traffic law already adopted by 36 C.F.R. § 4.2 (2010). Finding no error, we affirm.

This court reviews de novo whether the ACA assimilates a state offense. See United States v. Dotson, 615 F.3d 1162, 1165 (9th Cir.2010). We conclude there was no error and the Virginia statute was properly assimilated under the ACA. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s judgment. See, e.g., United States v. Fox, 60 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir.1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hope, 408 F. App'x 695 (4th Cir. 2011).

408 F. App'x 695 (United States v. Hope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hope v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 118 (Supreme Court, 2011)