United States v. Hope

316 F. App'x 263
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 12, 2009
Docket08-5169
StatusUnpublished

This text of 316 F. App'x 263 (United States v. Hope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hope, 316 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ramon R. Hope seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered judgment on October 19, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on November 24, 2008. Because Hope failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

To the extent Hope's notice of appeal relates to the district court's November 13, 2008 order denying his request for an extension of time in which to file a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion, the order Hope seeks to appeal is a non-appealable interlocutory order, and this court is without jurisdiction to consider it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 F. App'x 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hope-ca4-2009.