United States v. Hood

26 F. Cas. 369, 2 D.C. 133, 2 Cranch 133

This text of 26 F. Cas. 369 (United States v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hood, 26 F. Cas. 369, 2 D.C. 133, 2 Cranch 133 (circtddc 1817).

Opinion

But

the Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

decided that it was no bar. He offended against two laws. The by-law could not repeal the general law of the land. It is not the same offence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 369, 2 D.C. 133, 2 Cranch 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hood-circtddc-1817.