United States v. Homer W. Walker

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Homer W. Walker

72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39611, 1995 WL 734443

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 12, 1995

Docket95-7428

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 128 (United States v. Homer W. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Homer W. Walker, 72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39611, 1995 WL 734443 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

72 F.3d 128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Homer W. WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7428.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-93-6, CA-95-745-5-BR)

Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. John Douglas McCullough, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-93-6; CA-95-745-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

In light of this disposition, Walker's motion to expedite his appeal is denied as moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Homer W. WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7428.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-93-6, CA-95-745-5-BR)

Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. John Douglas McCullough, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-93-6; CA-95-745-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

In light of this disposition, Walker's motion to expedite his appeal is denied as moot

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39611, 1995 WL 734443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-homer-w-walker-ca4-1995.