United States v. Homer Lee Tucker

991 F.2d 1518, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6073, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11133
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Homer Lee Tucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 F.3d 673
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 13, 1993·No. 87-5090·Published

Opinion

991 F.2d 1518

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Homer Lee TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-5090.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 13, 1993.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 964 F.2d 952.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Homer Lee Tucker, 991 F.2d 1518, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6073, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11133 (9th Cir. 1993).

991 F.2d 1518 (United States v. Homer Lee Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Homer Lee Tucker
964 F.2d 952 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Tucker
991 F.2d 1518 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)