United States v. Homer Lee Norton
This text of 440 F.2d 1067 (United States v. Homer Lee Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
440 F.2d 1067
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Homer Lee NORTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 31096
Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
March 26, 1971.
Joseph V. Canto, court appointed, Gainesville, Fla., for defendant-appellant.
William Stafford, U. S. Atty., Clinton Ashmore, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F.2d 1067, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-homer-lee-norton-ca5-1971.