United States v. Holton
This text of 559 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Holton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kenny Montana Holton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(a)(1) (district court may reduce term of imprisonment under § 3582(c)(2) for defendant whose Guidelines range has been lowered by an amendment to the Guidelines). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 F. App'x 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-holton-ca4-2014.