United States v. Holt

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Holt. Read the opinion of the Court — 287 F. App'x 384
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2006·No. 05-31100·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-31100 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

GREGORY HOLT,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CR-20012-ALL --------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, counsel appointed to represent

appellant Gregory Holt, has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Holt has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Holt, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Holt (United States v. Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)