United States v. Holper
376 F. App'x 362
Opinion
The attorney appointed to represent Mark Holper has moved for leave to with[363] draw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Holper has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Holper’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Holper, 376 F. App'x 362 (5th Cir. 2010).
376 F. App'x 362 (United States v. Holper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)