United States v. Holmes
This text of 574 F. App'x 884 (United States v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Donald Holmes in these direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Holmes and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holmes’s conviction, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
574 F. App'x 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-holmes-ca11-2014.