United States v. Holmes

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Holmes

574 F. App'x 884

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 31, 2014·No. Nos. 13-14801, 13-14802·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Donald Holmes in these direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Holmes and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holmes’s conviction, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Donald Holmes in these direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Holmes and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holmes’s conviction, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Holmes, 574 F. App'x 884 (11th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

574 F. App'x 884 (United States v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related