United States v. Holmes

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Holmes. Read the opinion of the Court — 595 F.3d 1255
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 29, 2011·No. 10-13099·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APR 29, 2011 No. 10-13099 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00440-JSM-TGW-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DELROY HOLMES,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________

(April 29, 2011)

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Brent Armstrong, appointed counsel for Delroy Holmes, has filed a motion

to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record

reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,

and Holmes’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Holmes, (11th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Holmes (United States v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)