United States v. Hollis

43 F. 248, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204
District Court, W.D. South Carolina·Decided August 16, 1890·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simonton, J.

The act of 16th of March, 1878, (20 St. at Large, 30,) provides that a defendant charged with crime shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness; that is to say, he shall not labor under disability because he is a party in interest, and, not[249]*249withstanding this, may testily. But when a party offers himself as a witness in his own behalf he must be treated as any other witness, and is subject to any exception which would apply to any other witness. In other words, the act frees him from a disability. It does not confer on him any peculiar exemption. So when a defendant is put on the stand as a witness his general character for truth may be attacked, and if he, by his conduct, had lost the privilege of testifying in courts of justice by the commission of an infamous crime, this will attach to him, and prevent him from testifying in his own behalf.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hollis, 43 F. 248, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204 (southcarolinawd 1890).

43 F. 248 (United States v. Hollis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. McClish
115 F. 268 (Sixth Circuit, 1902)
Wolfson v. United States
102 F. 134 (Fifth Circuit, 1900)
Spurr v. United States
87 F. 701 (Sixth Circuit, 1898)