United States v. Hollis

43 F. 248, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina
DecidedAugust 16, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 F. 248 (United States v. Hollis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hollis, 43 F. 248, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204 (southcarolinawd 1890).

Opinion

Simonton, J.

The act of 16th of March, 1878, (20 St. at Large, 30,) provides that a defendant charged with crime shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness; that is to say, he shall not labor under disability because he is a party in interest, and, not[249]*249withstanding this, may testily. But when a party offers himself as a witness in his own behalf he must be treated as any other witness, and is subject to any exception which would apply to any other witness. In other words, the act frees him from a disability. It does not confer on him any peculiar exemption. So when a defendant is put on the stand as a witness his general character for truth may be attacked, and if he, by his conduct, had lost the privilege of testifying in courts of justice by the commission of an infamous crime, this will attach to him, and prevent him from testifying in his own behalf.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. McClish
115 F. 268 (Sixth Circuit, 1902)
Wolfson v. United States
102 F. 134 (Fifth Circuit, 1900)
Spurr v. United States
87 F. 701 (Sixth Circuit, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F. 248, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hollis-southcarolinawd-1890.