United States v. Holder

150 F. App'x 347
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 2005
Docket03-50948
StatusUnpublished

This text of 150 F. App'x 347 (United States v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Holder, 150 F. App'x 347 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: **

This court affirmed Niguel Deshon Holder’s judgment of conviction. United States v. Holder, 109 Fed. Appx. 673, 674 (5th Cir.2004). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Holder v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1093, 160 L.Ed.2d 1061 (2005).

Holder argues that his Booker claim is not subject to plain-error review because his petition for certiorari was pending when Booker was issued. This court applies the plain-error standard of review to unpreserved Booker claims even in cases such as this one. United States v. Cruz, 418 F.3d 481, 482 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. Lewis, 412 F.3d 614, 616 (5th Cir.2005). Holder’s challenge to his sentence fails to meet the plain-error standard because he has not shown that the error affected his substantial rights. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517).

Accordingly, we conclude that nothing in the Supreme Court’s Booker decision requires us to change our prior affirmance in this case. We therefore reinstate our judgment affirming the defendant’s conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

**

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Holder
109 F. App'x 673 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Cruz
418 F.3d 481 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Mares
402 F.3d 511 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Lewis
412 F.3d 614 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Holder v. United States
543 U.S. 1115 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 F. App'x 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-holder-ca5-2005.