United States v. Holcomb

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Holcomb. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 F.4th 1118
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2025·No. 23-469·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 11 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-469 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cr-00075-RSL-1 Western District of Washington, v. Seattle JOHN HOLCOMB, ORDER

Defendant - Appellant.

Before: GRABER and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.*

The Opinion filed March 27, 2025, and appearing at 132 F.4th 1118 (9th Cir.

2025), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any

district court of the Ninth Circuit. The court will file a new opinion in due course.

Because the court’s opinion is withdrawn, the petition for rehearing en banc is

DENIED as moot. Once a new opinion is filed, further petitions for rehearing and

rehearing en banc may be filed.

* The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Holcomb, (9th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Holcomb (United States v. Holcomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Holcomb
132 F.4th 1118 (Ninth Circuit, 2025)