United States v. Hofierka

92 F.3d 1108, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22057, 1996 WL 455506
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 28, 1996·No. Nos. 95-2151, 95-2258·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and HATCHETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the appellants’ petition for panel rehearing, the same is granted; and the opinion filed in this case on May 16, 1996, and published at 83 F.3d 357, is modified in one respect. Footnote 7 of the opinion is deleted.

In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hofierka, 92 F.3d 1108, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22057, 1996 WL 455506 (11th Cir. 1996).

92 F.3d 1108 (United States v. Hofierka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Telemaque
632 F. App'x 602 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Charles Dana Combs, II
546 F. App'x 920 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Debbie H. George
184 F.3d 1119 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Shannon Shaw
180 F.3d 920 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Slugocki v. US BY AND THROUGH DEPT. OF LABOR
988 F. Supp. 1443 (S.D. Florida, 1997)
United States v. George A. Pelensky
129 F.3d 63 (Second Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Pettiford
101 F.3d 199 (First Circuit, 1996)